Example Return on Value Driver’s Model
Below is a sample chart of potential value drivers for the hypothetical middle-market technology company, “Acme Software.” My analysis includes commentary about why and how I rated each value driver, and a rating based on the four key criteria – return, risk, time, and investment.
Note: I rated the criteria from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most favorable and 1 being the least favorable. For example, a 10 rating for risk means the action is considered low risk, and a 2.0 rating for risk represents a greater risk. A 9.0 rating for investment indicates that a low investment is required, and a 2.0 rating denotes that a significant investment may be necessary. The weighting below will vary significantly from company to company. For example, in a business with underperforming metrics, the potential return on improving a particular value driver may be as high as a 9 or 10, but in a company with favorable metrics, this represents a possible return as low as 2 or 3.
Return on Value Drivers: Acme Software | |||||
Value Driver | Return (Potential Return) | Risk | Time(Time Required) | Investment(Investment Required) | Overall Rating |
Increase Pricing | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 9.25 |
Document Comparable Transactions | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9.25 |
Reduce Staff-Related Risk | 9 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 7.75 |
Reduce Concentrations of Risk | 7 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 6.75 |
Increase Revenue and EBITDA | 10 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6.25 |
Conduct an Audit of the Software Code | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6.25 |
Strengthen IP | 5 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 6.25 |
Enhance Sales and Marketing | 8 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6.00 |
Increase Cost to Replicate | 10 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5.75 |
Increase Recurring Revenue | 10 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 5.75 |
Strengthen Customer Base | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5.25 |
Improve Documentation, Infrastructure and Scalability | 7 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5.50 |